30 November 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Discoveries and controversies in science today.
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(93)
-
▼
November
(33)
- Speaking of Astronomical naming conventions
- Global Warming: the numbers
- Dinsaurs vs. Democrats
- Blog Plug: One Man Bandwidth
- Global warming facts and fiction
- Teh Blogfather
- Era of Understanding
- Higher Ed's response to Kansas Creationism
- Periphally related: homsexualy and the church
- Astronomy naming conventions
- Kansas Biology Test
- Fish to lizards: the evolution of land creatures
- 6563
- Fulfilled!
- Butterfly LEDs
- Review of UnIntelligent Design
- Potentially related blogs via "Rent My Blog"
- Icon request
- Denial
- Glowing Food...
- Bird Flu and Cytokines
- Academia: the path to science
- Venus probe launched successfully
- Shoutout: The Esoteric Science Resource Center (sc...
- Kansas creationists redefine science
- Pseudoscience in politics spreads to Germany, stop...
- Biblical Plague: Avian Flu
- US hostile to science
- Reader's Question
- Statistics and Trends
- To Heal The World
- Vatican to America: evolution has proof, fundament...
- Astronomers discover first starlight; CNN can't fi...
-
▼
November
(33)
2 comments:
Cute cartoon, ZP.
As for what we know now vs. what we knew then, We have definitely taken a lot of data since your childhood circa 1950. The data we had up to 1950 looked like a thousand years of cooling (since the year 1000) with a little bit of warming in the last forty years (since 1910). At the time, the data for 1910-1950 looked like it was probably just a statistical anamoly. However, since 1950 the average global temperature has continued to rise, and more dramatically than anything else we have in the data. With nearly 100 years of dramatic warming we can safely conclude that recent trends are for global warming. [2] The wonder of science is that as we get more data, we get to revise our theories.Sightline Payments Kirk SanfordTop Casinos Online
Post a Comment